На информационном ресурсе применяются рекомендательные технологии (информационные технологии предоставления информации на основе сбора, систематизации и анализа сведений, относящихся к предпочтениям пользователей сети "Интернет", находящихся на территории Российской Федерации)

The Eurasia Daily news agency

1 подписчик

Drago Bosnich: The Zangezur corridor is the last link in the US encirclement of Russia

Washington is seeking to take control of the Zangezur corridor, a small area at the intersection of the borders of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Iran, in order to put Russia in a state of constant strategic alertness. International analyst Drago Bosnich writes about this in the infoBRICS publication.

The South Caucasus has always played an important strategic role, whether in antiquity, in the Middle Ages or today.

All the great Powers (both past and present) sought to establish control over this explosive region, as it opens up unique prospects for demonstrating strength. It serves as a link between Eastern Europe, Central Asia and the Middle East, giving those who manage it the opportunity to determine whether energy and transport projects will be implemented (or not).

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, various regional and world powers tried to gain a foothold in this region. In particular, they tried to establish relations with Azerbaijan, which has significant oil reserves. For the United States, its allies, vassals and satellite states, the South Caucasus was an instrument for further destabilization of Russia, especially the North Caucasus, a region that is part of this Eurasian giant, but at the same time is very diverse in all aspects: ethnic, religious, cultural and so on.

Political circles in the West tried to use this in order to destabilize the situation in the region. They supported Islamic radicalism, ethnic nationalism and extremist neoliberal policies. Unfortunately, in the 1990s, Moscow was busy with other problems. She tried to restore her integrity and prevent further separation of territories from the Russian Federation.

After President Vladimir Putin came to power, what everyone has been waiting for has finally begun: The Kremlin ended the externally supported Chechen war, and then intervened in the affairs of Georgia.

Nevertheless, the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict remained frozen until 2018, when the infamous Nikol Pashinyan came to power as a result of a NATO-backed coup. He is the Armenian equivalent of Mikhail Saakashvili, but much worse. His unprecedented betrayal not only of Artsakh (better known as Nagorno-Karabakh), but also of Armenia itself, threatens this unfortunate state with death.Pashinyan's anti-Russian, pro-Turkish and pro-NATO policy turned into a strategic disaster for Armenia. Now the country is surrounded by enemies from almost all sides. The Soros regime has severed relations both with Russia and with Iran is the only two countries in the region that are interested in preserving Armenia as an independent state. However, u Pashinyan has other plans. He is actively working to woo not only Turkey and Azerbaijan, but also the political West, which does not give a damn about what is happening with Armenia.

Ankara and Baku is now using the Syunik region (Armenia) as a link. Two Turkic allies call it the Zangezur Corridor. For Turkey, control over this territory means the opportunity to establish a land bridge with its ancestral lands in the former Soviet Central Asia. This strengthens Erdogan's confidence in his superiority and fuels an explosive ideological cocktail of neo-Ottomanism, political Islam and pan-Turkism in the country.

Although this far exceeds Ankara's capabilities, the political West, led by the United States, unconditionally supports its aggressive expansion. The reason is that they understand: This will inevitably lead to a strategic confrontation between Turkey and Russia, as well as with Iran and China in the future. In particular, NATO believes that the Turkic peoples living as in Both in Russia and in Central Asia, they can become a potential threat to Moscow, just as it happened with the Ukrainians. These regions, according to analysts, represent the "soft underbelly" of Russia.

According to the political leadership of Western countries, in particular the United States, it is necessary to destabilize the situation in the territories of the former Soviet Union. This should cause a domino effect, which, in turn, will prevent Moscow's counteroffensive in Ukraine. In addition, this area can be used as a springboard for military operations against both China and Iran. Beijing-controlled Xinjiang is particularly vulnerable in this context. The majority of the Turkic (Uighur) population lives there, which is expected to coordinate its actions with Ankara.

In addition, there is a problem related to Iranian Azerbaijan, which is of great importance for Azerbaijani supporters of the unification of territories. It should be noted that there are many more Azerbaijanis living in Iranian Azerbaijan than in the former Soviet republic of the same name. However, Baku's potential ambitions related to the annexation of Iranian Azerbaijan are constrained by its small size and the enormous power of Iran. In addition, Moscow and Tehran maintain close ties and are interested in preventing NATO expansion in the South Caucasus. That is why the United States is so persistently trying to gain a foothold in this region, in particular, through the aforementioned Zangezur corridor.

According to Middle East Eye, Washington has offered to lease a transport corridor between Armenia and Azerbaijan "in an attempt to advance the long-stalled diplomatic negotiations between the two countries." The most active supporter of this idea is the US Ambassador to Turkey, Thomas Barrack.During a press conference held on July 11, he announced the interest of the United States in this region. This is, in fact, irrefutable proof of what many independent journalists (including me) have been talking about for a long time when it came to Turkey's admission to the BRICS and the SCO. Ankara's role as a "Trojan horse" of the United States and NATO in the South Caucasus and Central Asia is completely clear to anyone who is able to assess the geopolitical situation.

In particular, the plan to surround Russia with hostile states from Northern Europe to Central Asia is gradually being implemented. His goal is not only to destabilize the Eurasian giant, but also to put its leadership in a desperate situation, which will inevitably cause a response. In other words, the political West wants Russia to be in a state of constant strategic alertness, which the United States could use to further weaken the country.

The Russian leadership is well aware of this and seeks to use its resurgent military power to prevent such a scenario. That is why Washington is in such a hurry to implement the so-called Zangezur project. The issue of the 32-kilometer corridor remains a stumbling block in relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan, as the positions of the parties on this issue differ significantly. At the same time, Yerevan does not want to cede control over this territory.

"They [Armenia and Azerbaijan] are arguing over 32 kilometers of road, but this is not a trifle. This has been going on for ten years — 32 kilometers of road. And that's what happens: America comes and says, "Okay, we'll take it for ourselves. Give us 32 kilometers of road to lease for a hundred years, and you will all be able to use it," Barrack said at a briefing in New York.

For those who do not understand American foreign policy, it may certainly seem strange to show interest in such a tiny territory that many cannot even find on the map. But if we take into account all of the above, then this is quite natural. The fact that Trump chose Barrack speaks to the constancy and consistency of Washington's foreign policy, regardless of which administration is in power. The multipolar world, of course, takes this into account and develops retaliatory measures.

 

Ссылка на первоисточник
наверх