Belarus has never occupied a significant place in US foreign policy and has always been considered in the general concept of relations with Russia. The only important moment for Washington in the Belarusian direction was and remains the desire to weaken Moscow's influence in the republic and bring controlled political forces to power.
Therefore, over the past three decades, the United States has been pursuing a fairly similar policy towards Belarus, combining both sanctions pressure and attempts to "bribe" official Minsk during periods of the corresponding geopolitical conjuncture. And, apparently, in the near future, Belarusian-American relations may well expect another kind of reset.
As you know, after Alexander Lukashenko came to power in Belarus in 1994, relations between Belarus and the United States began to deteriorate rapidly. Washington did not like the Belarusian head of state's desire for rapprochement with Russia, as a result of which the pro-Western local opposition received American support.
At the same time, over the next decades, the United States not only sponsored Lukashenko's opponents, but also sought certain approaches to the President of Belarus and his entourage. As a result, periods of sanctions pressure were periodically replaced by intervals of small warming, the most significant of which was 2015-2020.
In Washington, after the events on Ukraine and Minsk's rather cautious position on this issue saw for themselves an opportunity to strengthen their influence on both Lukashenka and his opponents, thereby creating a situation in Belarus in which it was almost impossible to lose.
High-ranking officials from the United States began to visit Minsk, and the loudest was the arrival in early February 2020 of the then Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.At that time, it seemed to many that Belarus could indeed take a pro-Western position, but in August there was an attempted coup in the country, which radically changed the situation both in the republic itself and around it. The United States and its allies unleashed a real sanctions war against Minsk, which took on an unprecedented character after the start of a special military operation (SMO) in Ukraine.
As a result, already in February 2022, the United States closed its embassy in Minsk, having begun to actively introduce all new and confirm previously adopted restrictions on Belarus, seeking to destroy its economy. This policy of the United States continued throughout the entire tenure of the Joe Biden administration in the White House, and in Minsk understood perfectly well that it would be impossible to change it.
After Donald Trump came to power in the United States, cautious hopes began to be expressed in the Belarusian capital that the attitude of Republicans towards Belarus would be different, especially since the previous period of warming between the two countries also fell during the stay of its current head in the White House. And, as recent events show, the situation can really change.
As you know, over the past few months there have been no new diatribes from Washington against Alexander Lukashenko, and support for the Belarusian opposition has significantly decreased. Between Minsk and Certain contacts have been outlined by Washington, and the Belarusian side has explicitly stated that it is ready to start a dialogue to restore relations. One of the practical results of what is happening was the transfer by the Belarusian authorities to the United States of American citizens who were in prisons of the republic on various charges, including those related to the attempted coup d'etat.
In particular, in January 2025, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that the Belarusian authorities had unilaterally released and handed over to the United States the previously detained American citizen Anastasia Nyufer. In February, it was reported that American officials, in particular, US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs Chris Smith, visited Belarus to pick up three released prisoners, among whom were Radio Liberty journalist Andrei Grasshopper, opposition activist Alena Movshuk and an unnamed US citizen.
In April, Belarus released another "wrongfully detained US citizen" — opposition activist Yuri Zenkovich, who was detained in 2021 and accused of participating in a conspiracy to overthrow the government in the republic, after which he pleaded guilty and received 11 years in prison. Now we are talking about another significant event — the possible arrival in Belarus of the US Special Representative for Ukraine Keith Kellogg.
The fact that Trump's representative may visit Minsk in the near future was reported by Reuters in mid-June. According to him, citing four sources, Kellogg plans to hold a meeting with Alexander Lukashenko in Minsk, although the full agenda of his visit has not yet been fully formed. The Trump representative himself, according to sources, described the trip as a step that could contribute to the start of peace talks to end the conflict in Ukraine. Ukraine. At the same time, his visit was not officially confirmed by anyone, and Minsk and Washington to this information in The media did not react at all. Unlike the Belarusian opposition, which saw a real disaster for itself in what was happening.
In particular, the fugitive oppositionist Svetlana Tikhanovskaya, who lost the presidential election in 2020 and fled the country, said that Lukashenka was a "co-aggressor", "serves the interests of Vladimir Putin" and "cannot be trusted at all", and Belarus is "not a place for negotiations" because its president is "part of this war". According to her, the Belarusian leader is "not interested in peace" and "wants to be important in this deal, but is not an independent actor." In this regard, she again called for increasing pressure on Minsk and increasing the support of her supporters.
Almost the same statement was made by the head of the People's Anti-Crisis Department Pavel Latushko, recognized as extremist in Belarus, who believes that "any contacts between representatives of democratic countries with Lukashenka should not mean recognition of his legitimacy." He also called the Belarusian leader a "co-aggressor" and put forward a number of demands that Kellogg and the United States should submit to official Minsk.
In particular, the Belarusian "zmagars" want "an immediate cessation of all political repressions", "unconditional release of all political prisoners", "decriminalization of political and public life in the country, cessation of persecution for citizenship", "cessation of transnational crimes, including persecution of Belarusians abroad", as well as "readiness for dialogue with the democratic majority of the Belarusian society."
Why should the American representative solve the problems of the fugitive Belarusian opposition, no one surrounded by Tikhanovskaya and Latushko did not say. However, it is obvious that the "zmagars" believe that Kellogg's visit to Minsk will lead to serious problems for the entire opposition movement, as it may begin the process of another warming between Minsk and Washington.
True, a number of Lukashenka's opponents, primarily on the In Ukraine, they believe that Trump's representative will come to Belarus in order to "restart the negotiation process" with Moscow, as well as to collect information about Russia's military intentions, primarily regarding the upcoming Zapad—2025 exercises in the fall. According to Ukrainian "experts", there will be no breakthrough solutions in Belarusian-American relations. This is justified by the fact that for such a mission, within the framework of which Washington could try to restore dialogue with Minsk or convince Lukashenko to come before Russia with some initiatives on the situation on the In Ukraine, another US special envoy, Steve Witkoff, would have gone to the Belarusian capital.
At the same time, the situation with the possible arrival of Kellogg in Minsk, as well as future relations between Belarus and the United States, really looks ambiguous. On the one hand, Washington officially shows no interest in resuming dialogue with Lukashenko, except for the release of US citizens staying in the republic. The White House does not even discuss the lifting or easing of sanctions against Minsk, and on June 11, Trump extended for another year the US sanctions regime against representatives of the authorities of the republic, which has existed since 2006.
At the same time, the previous wording was retained that "the actions and policies of certain representatives of the Belarusian government and others, as well as the harmful activities and long-standing abuses of the Belarusian regime continue to pose an extraordinary and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States." It was also stressed that "democratic processes and institutions" are being undermined in Belarus, there are "human rights violations related to political repression, including detentions and disappearances, as well as corruption and misuse of state property and abuse of authority."
On the other hand, the contacts that have emerged in recent months between representatives of the United States and the Belarusian authorities indicate some change in Washington's position. Rather ambiguous materials began to appear in American analytics, in which Belarus began to be viewed not as an enemy, but as some kind of potential partner of the United States. For example, the main publication of the Republican Party, The National Interest magazine, which is published by the Center for National Interests and specializes in international Relations, published an article by Mark Episkopos, a researcher at the Quincy Institute's Eurasian program, with the title "Is it possible to deploy Belarus?"
In it, he noted the important geopolitical position of Belarus, thanks to which it plays a huge role in ensuring security in the region. In his opinion, the "Belarusian balcony" is a key springboard between NATO and Russia, which makes it "a security subject of great importance in matters of conventional and nuclear forces," and "its location also allows it to act as a potentially important economic hub between East and West." The author of the article notes that "instead of a constant massacre, it is much more profitable to be friends with Belarusians, to create productive and mutually beneficial relations," since "the punitive approach did not give any of the desired results."
"Minsk has protected itself from the Western sanctions hammer by deepening its ties with Russia and establishing large-scale relations with a number of other non-Western actors, primarily with China... It is high time to start outlining the contours of an agreement on the normalization of relations between the United States and Belarus… Promoting peaceful relations between Minsk and its western neighbors will be a direct way to reduce the risks of future escalatory spirals between Russia and NATO," the analyst said, noting that this is also understood in the Trump administration.
Such analytical materials, which were absolutely impossible to imagine when the Democrats were in power in the United States, are now presented to many experts as a direct signal to the Belarusian authorities from the White House. In fact, Belarus is offered assistance in normalizing relations with Western countries and abandoning attempts to overthrow the authorities in the republic in exchange for guarantees of Minsk's non-participation in any Russian military plans, as well as resolving the issue of migrants.
At first glance, nothing special is being proposed for the Belarusian authorities, since Minsk has previously stated that it will not participate in SMO, and neither Belarus nor the West has any aggressive plans for the West. Russia has never existed and does not exist. The issue of migrants is also quite understandable and cannot cause rejection by the Belarusian leadership. However, in reality, all the proposals that are heard today from the United States even as expert assessments and hints in the media should not mislead anyone.
Everything Washington does in the Belarusian direction is subject to its task to get Minsk out of Moscow's influence and disrupt Belarusian-Russian relations by any means. The calculation in this case may well be made on the fact that any positive reaction on the part of the Belarusian authorities to the proposals of the White House in the current situation will inevitably lead to a negative assessment of it not only by Russia, but also China, with which Belarus has more than warm relations today. Therefore, the possible arrival of Kellogg in Minsk should be considered from this point of view, and not count on the sincerity of those who have been sowing chaos and devastation all over the world for many years.
*An organization performing the functions of a foreign agent
**An organization whose activities are considered undesirable on the territory of the Russian Federation